Monthly Archives: July 2012

The Loss of Heaven?

“…because I dread the loss of Heaven and the pains of Hell…”

I was in confession a few years ago when the priest, just before the part where you’re supposed to make your Act of Contrition, advised me to recite the version with the above line in it, rather than the one that says, “because of thy just punishments.”  His reasoning was that he felt it would cause me to reflect on why one would dread losing heaven and fear going to hell in the first place.  It’s one of those things that just stuck with me, and to this day— thanks to that priest—I find myself really concentrating on those words whenever I am in the confessional.

I tell you this because it hovers around something I have wanted to write a post about for a while, only I’ve been telling myself I wasn’t ready to write it yet.  So with the disclaimer that I’m nowhere close to being holy enough to write this post as of yet, I’ll press on with this honest and terrifying thought:

Heaven sounds incredibly dull.

Or at least, the ridiculous ideas and images that we concoct for ourselves of what heaven will be like sound incredibly dull.  Even if you could convince yourself that bouncing around on a cloud might be somewhat quaint, who the heck wants to spend ETERNITY flying around with fat babies and playing the harp?  So we’ll feed ourselves vague and somewhat comforting lines to try and convince ourselves that heaven is worth fighting for (or at the very least, that Hell is worth avoiding).  Heaven is really just whatever you want it to be, we’ll say.  Whatever makes you happiest—that’s what your heaven will be.  Chocolate and football and your favorite band on repeat.  Neat.  But not all that satisfying.

I think we know deep down that no earthly good—no matter how good—is going to be enough to bring us eternal happiness.  So really, heaven just isn’t something we think about all that much because we’re frankly not that impressed with any version of it that has been presented to us.

Thankfully, the end goal of the Christian life is not the heaven of the comic strips we grew up reading.  We weren’t created for harps and butterflies.  We were created for communion with the living God.

The real problem: The thought of this is actually more terrifying than an eternity of clouds and rainbows.

“He came to his own home, and his own people received him not.  But to all who received him, who believed in his name, he gave power to become children of God” (John 1:11-12)

To us, the phrase “Children of God” has lost all of its impact.  To us, it just sounds sweet.  Cute, even.  But being God’s children implies that we are…well, I’ll let St. Paul explain it:

“For you did not receive the spirit of slavery to fall back into fear, but you have received the spirit of sonship.  When we cry, ‘Abba! Father!’ it is the Spirit himself bearing witness with our spirit that we are children of God, and if children, then heirs, heirs of God and fellow heirs with Christ, provided we suffer with him in order that we may also be glorified with him (Romans 8:15-17)

Fellow heirs with Christ.  You know, the Son of God?  The Second Person of the Trinity?  The Messiah?  Our Savior?  Yeah, the goal of our life is to enter into His glory.

I don’t know about you, but I think I belong with the fat babies on the clouds before I am anywhere close to sharing in the glory of Christ.  But this is the call of the Christian life.  This is what it is all leading up to.  Christ wants to give us more than an eternity’s supply of chocolate and ice cream—He wants us to enter into His communion with the Father.

The work of our live is to continually give our lives over to Christ, and to unite ourselves with His suffering on the cross, so that by suffering with him, we may also be glorified with him.

 

Pillars of Catholicism (read if you like free stuff)

Did You Know….

“Marking the 50th anniversary of the Second Vatican Council, Pope Benedict XVI has declared the year, beginning on October 12, 2012 and ending November 24, 2013, “The Year of Faith.” In particular, the Holy Father is calling upon all Catholics to confront what he identifies as one of the most difficult challenges the Church faces today: ‘religious illiteracy.’ That is, a lack of understanding about what Christians really believe.

“To address this problem, Pope Benedict has called upon Catholics to spend the year studying the Catechism of the Catholic Church, the official compendium of all Catholic teaching.”

An incredibly talented group of students at my alma mater, John Paul the Great Catholic University, has been hard at work on a project in response to the Pope’s call.  It’s called “Pillars of Catholicism”

Pillars of Catholicism launches next month, on August 20th,  and it is a completely free, exclusively online, 13 session course designed to teach anyone about the fundamentals of the Catholic faith.  All you need to do is sign up with your email address and you’ll get:

  • access to online videos of all 13 class sessions
  • course study guides and notes
  • you’ll be able to take online quizzes to track your learning
  • In addition, you’ll also be able to ask the faculty any questions you may have via the online learning platform.
  • And yes, it’s all 100% free.

One of the coolest things about this project: The professors are none other than JP Catholic’s very own philosophy, theology, and scripture professors: Fr. Andrew Younan, Dr. Christine Wood, and Dr. Michael Barber.

On a personal note: These are the instructors to whom I owe my theological formation.  I guarantee you that this blog would be missing many of my favorite and (in my opinion) most thoughtful posts if it were not for discussions in Fr. Andy’s philosophy classes, or thoughts or questions scribbled in the margins of my notes from Dr. Wood or Dr. Barber’s lectures.  Not to mention, I wouldn’t have stuck with this blog for as long as I have were it not for the fact that it began as my own small response to the university’s mission statement to “Impact Culture for Christ.”

I know this could probably be said to some degree of any field of study, but something I find funny about getting my Master’s degree in Biblical Theology (and I think this rings truer of this field than most) is that by the time I graduate the program, I won’t be even close to having “mastered” Biblical Theology in the slightest.  There’s always room to go deeper when it comes to the our faith.  You’ll never stop learning about the faith; and that’s a very good thing.

The Pillars of Catholicism course will be available beginning August 20th, but you can follow their Facebook page now to get updates, check out pictures of the filming progress, or to post any questions or comments you have on their wall.

I believe in Jesus Christ

Say what you will about the state of our culture.  Personally, I think that one we have going for us is that—for better or for worse—people do not take the statement, “I believe in Jesus Christ,” lightly.

To say, “I believe in Jesus Christ” implies much more than an affirmation of the existence of an historical person.  It implies a whole set of beliefs, a certain lifestyle.  To proclaim belief in Jesus Christ is a bold statement.

Why?  Because “belief” means more than you might realize on the surface.

You can’t believe in a dead person.  Many admirable men and women have gone before us, and we can certainly acknowledge their achievements and seek to emulate them, but we would not say, for example, “I believe in Martin Luther King Jr.”  It sounds weird, right?  We could certainly say, “I believe in what MLK Jr. stood for,” or, “I believe we should all try to be more like him,” but to say “I believe in him” today sounds odd to us.  And it should.  You can’t believe (present-tense) in a person that is not alive.

So when you say, “I believe in Jesus,” you’re saying that you believe Jesus is alive today.  That’s huge; and that by itself would be enough to make you pause and reflect before speaking, but it goes even deeper.

When you profess belief in Jesus, you’re professing belief in a living person, but this belief means more than acknowledging the existence of a living person.  Think about the people you know in your life today.  I have a close friend named Jaclyn.  For me to say, “I believe in Jaclyn,” of course implies a lot more than if I were to simply say, “I believe that a person named Jaclyn exists today.”  We all know this from experience.  For me to say, “I believe in Jaclyn” means that I have confidence in the person that Jaclyn is.  It means that I know her on some sort of deeper level; and it means that I trust her based on my relationship with her.

Apply this to the claim, “I believe in Jesus Christ” and you will spend your lifetime realizing the implications.  Do we have confidence in the Person of Jesus Christ?  Do we know who He is and what he stands for?  Can we trust Him?  Can we really say we believe in Jesus Christ if we only half-heartedly believe in His teachings?

The bottom line of all of this is that you can’t claim to believe in somebody you don’t know.  This should be a wakeup call to us all, because there is always room to grow in our relationship with Jesus.  If we’re not growing in relationship, our confidence—our belief—will start to fade.  So let’s boldly proclaim belief in Jesus, but let’s make sure that claim constantly reminds us of our need to grow in deeper relationship with Him.

 

I Am [not] An Atheist

Bashing atheists isn’t really my thing, and it’s not what this post will be about.

The thing is, I write a blog for young Catholics (and then I guess for anyone else who wants to read it), and I talk a lot about how much I love the Catholic faith and how great Jesus is and all that…and all along this “God” character is sort of just accepted as a given in my world.  Yes, I was raised by parents that believe in God, and no, I’ve never seriously doubted His existence.

See, to me, Romans 1:20 has always summed up all the proof I’ve ever needed for God’s existence:

Ever since the creation of the world his invisible nature, namely, his eternal power and deity, has been clearly perceived in the things that have been made.

Translation: Look around!  This place is stunning!  Human beings are amazing!  Look at all the tiny intricacies of even the smallest organism on the planet!  Believing that this all happened by mere coincidence is a heck of a lot harder to swallow than believing in God.  At least that’s the way I look at things.

Big shock: the author of the Catholic blog believes in God.

But that doesn’t mean that I’ve never had questions; nor does it mean that I can’t recognize faulty logic when I see it, which brings me to this:

By now you have hopefully realized that I did not create the above meme.  Truth be told, I actually find the list of reasons given at the beginning of the picture for why this person is NOT an atheist to be far better reasons to say there’s no god than the one they seem to think packs the most punch (but those can be the topic of another day’s post).  Today we discuss “the burden of proof” and the “scientific method” (which, FYI, was developed by people in the Catholic Church).

Let’s start by acknowledging where the meme is right.  It’s impossible to prove the non-existence of something.  Science will never be able to prove that anything, let alone God, does not exist.

Now, I’m not a scientist and I won’t pretend to be.  But I’m 100% certain that science has no business outside of the natural realm.  If a god exists, then by definition, it’s not a natural being; it’s supernatural.  Since science can only tell us about the natural realm, it’s entirely possible for a supernatural being to exist without natural, empirical evidence (sight, sound, taste, touch, smell) for it.  Science cannot disprove god; but asking science to prove the existence of god misunderstands both science and the question of a god.

I know what you’re thinking.  Why not only believe in things that science can prove, then?  Things that we can see with our own eyes, things that we can hear or taste or smell or touch.  These are the only real and verifiable things, according to the logic of the above meme.

Sounds simple enough… but nobody actually lives in that world.  There are tons of things we believe in but cannot prove with the scientific method.  The most striking of these is love.  Love isn’t something we can smell or touch, but that doesn’t mean that we don’t believe in it simply because we can’t examine it under a microscope.  We experience love.  We know the pain of when love is lacking.  Try as we might, we can’t deny the existence of, or the need for, love.  Yet science will never be able to prove that love exists, and it would be silly to ask that of science.

If your only reason for not believing in God is because you can’t prove His existence with the scientific method, not only are you missing the point of science, you’re [presumably] missing out on some of the most beautiful aspects of this life.  Come into the real world, where “real” isn’t limited to only those things which we can smell, taste, see, hear, or touch.

 

Baptizing AJ and Hailey

The post below was written three years ago about the baptism of my niece, Cadence Rose.  Yesterday, my family welcomed into the family of God two more babies: my nephew, AJ (Cadence’s little brother!), and my niece, Hailey.

A lot has changed since I wrote the post below.  More babies have been born into my family, some of my siblings have moved states, and I’ve graduated college and am now preparing to start a family of my own.  But with all that has changed, it’s pretty cool to realize that some things stay the same.  However many more babies my family continues to have (and I pray that God blesses us with many more…I can’t even begin to describe the joy that my 10 nieces and nephews bring me :) ), we’ll still continue to bring them to Jesus to be baptized in the name of the Father, the Son, and the Holy Spirit.  Praise God for our unchanging Catholic Faith!

Baptizing Cadence Rose:

People were bringing even infants to him that he might touch them, and when the disciples saw this, they rebuked them.  Jesus, however, called the children to himself and said, “Let the children come to me and do not prevent them; for the kingdom of God belongs to such as these.”

-Luke 18:15-16

Yesterday was the baptism of my newest niece, Cadence Rose.  It was a beautiful baptism; and so nice to have my whole family together again for it.

My grandfather (an ordained deacon in the Catholic Church) performed the baptism. I love my grandpa.  He is so on fire for the Lord and so in love with God that you don’t leave a conversation with my grandpa questioning whether God is real.  My grandpa was the one who baptized me and my sister (and all our brothers) when we were babies, and I’ve watched him baptize my little cousins, and nieces and nephews.

We baptize our children as infants.  Some people have a problem with this because the child doesn’t have a say in whether or not he or she wants to be  baptized.  I think these people think that this somehow makes the baptism “less meaningful” for the one being baptized.  But I sort of think that misses the point of what baptism really is.

Baptism isn’t just a symbolic gesture that signifies one’s choice to follow Christ.  It’s true; that is part of it.  But there is so much more going on.  Baptism is the moment that the Spirit of God literally enters into a person.  It is the moment the walk begins.  It is the beginning of a lifelong relationship with God.  With the Holy Spirit dwelling inside of us, we can hear the voice of God talking to us.  Why wouldn’t I want to give that gift to my child as early as I possibly can?

It is important to note here, though, that a choice does indeed have to be made.  When we’re younger, it is a choice made by our parents on our behalf.  The parents have to choose to help the child foster a relationship with God.  In my family, that meant that my parents taught me how to pray.  They taught me to listen for God’s voice and to recognize it when I heard it, because God talks to all of us in the same voice we think to ourselves in.  Most importantly though, my family taught me that a relationship with God is normal.  It’s not the stuff of fairytales; it’s not the same thing as Santa and the Tooth Fairy.  God is real.  And I learned that as a child because I saw that my parents believed it as adults.

As I grew up, though, it came time for me to make my own choice.  We can’t ride on the coattails of our parents’ faith forever.  I had to decide whether I was going to choose to follow Christ on my own.  When I made that choice, I didn’t feel the need to go get baptized again to signify my decision.  In fact, I’ve found that I have to make the choice daily, sometimes hourly, in whether or not I am going to follow Christ.  He already lives in me.  The choice lies in whether or not I will decide to listen to Him.

(for more on infant baptism, check out this other old post: Boyfriends, Babies, & Jesus)