Question:
I recently came across this post
(http://canonlawmadeeasy.com/2011/03/21/index-of-forbidden-books/) by a canon lawyer talking about the history of the Vatican’s list of banned books. I was very surprised to see Victor Hugo’s Les
Miserables mentioned. I was planning on reading it before seeing the
upcoming movie adaptation, but I do not want to do so if it is a sin.
From everything I know about the book, it is not anti-Catholic or
Christian. I think one of the main characters is even a pious bishop.
So I am confused.
Answer:
Once upon a time there was a family. This family was, like a lot of families, made up of a Father, a Mother, and many children. Also like most families, in this family the Father and Mother set rules for their children. Some rules were more serious than others. It was expected that the children would be present for family meals, that they would do their part to keep the household in good order, and that they would obey certain rules of conduct (respect others, don’t lie, etc.). And like most families, if anyone failed in their responsibilities, it was expected that they would apologize and try to make amends.
The Church has many titles. Body of Christ, Bride of Christ, etc. It would be a misunderstanding to say that one of these titles is “more correct” than the others, because they are all true. However, one of my favorite titles of the Church is that of a loving Mother.
Let me paint a picture for you. It’s the period of the “Enlightenment.” Books are circulating. People are talking. Ideas are spreading. None of this is bad in itself; in fact it all sounds pretty good. But the Church is in the wake of the Protestant Reformation. Picture a Mother who has just seen a number of her children taken from her home, led away by someone claiming that what she was telling her children all those years was wrong. The mother still has children at home, but she’s understandably worried that they too will get swept away by false teachings. It’s time to set some rules.
I’ve written in the past that when I was younger, I wasn’t allowed to read certain books, see certain movies, or watch certain TV shows. What I’ve tried to convey (how successfully I did so is up for discussion) is that it wasn’t necessarily that my family thought these books or movies or TV shows were completely evil, or that we judged those families even in our faith community that took a different stance on certain books, movies, or television shows. It was simply that my parents saw that a certain book or movie could have potential to lead me or one of my siblings away from the truth and/or even into sin in some cases. For this reason, they put limits on the content that I was allowed to consume—like most parents do.
In a similar way, there was a time in Church history when the Church attempted to guard her children from false teachings or questionable doctrines by limiting their access to certain materials. The Index of forbidden books was created in 1559, and was constantly being updated and revised (as would be expected, given that new books were being published regularly) until Pope Paul VI abolished it in 1966. The link you provided does a good job of explaining what the Index was and why we don’t have it now.
But more to your question (and as the link says), the fact that the Index has been abolished doesn’t mean everything on it is automatically A-OK and 100% moral or in line with the truth. As with everything, we need to practice individual prudential judgment.
As for Les Miserables, I must confess that I have never read it (and have not yet seen the film), and so I cannot speak in great detail. What I have heard from those who have read it is that it’s a story of redemption, conversion and of hope in times of great trial: all very Christian themes. The link suggests that it was perhaps included in the Index because “it called into question both the need to respect lawful authorities and the laws themselves, and the consequent need to obey them.” Perhaps during this time in history the Church saw a number of her children struggling with this, and thought it best for them to avoid it. Perhaps even today a person that may really struggle with the need to obey and respect just law should avoid reading material that they may be tempted to use as justification for sinful action. Again, the need for prudential judgment is key.
Ideas matter. This is why it’s extremely important for anyone who creates anything (which, when you really think about it, includes all of us) to pray constantly that we are doing the work of God. Is it a sin for you to read or to see Les Miserables? I highly doubt it. It is certainly not a sin to read a book on the Index of forbidden books simply because it was once included in the Index.
I hope that answers your question, and I sincerely hope no one read this as my condemning Les Miserables.

Thank you, Mary. You did a great job of answering this.
I’ve never read the book, but from what I understand, Victor Hugo had some vehemently anti-Catholic sentiments that may have made their way into the novel…perhaps that’s why it was on the list? However, the musical is wonderful and VERY Catholic—Valjean’s redemption and turning back to God comes from the kindness of a Catholic bishop. The movie goes even further than the stage show in showing that Valjean is not only Christian, but Catholic—almost every time Hugh Jackman is on screen, you can see a crucifix or a rosary, and his devotion is obvious. I loved the movie and can’t recommend it enough. Not only is it a beautiful story, but the performances are incredible and it’s wonderful to see the Catholic faith portrayed in such a positive light (unusual for Hollywood!).
I am writing something on this very topic, and I was trying to do some research on the issue. Apparently, from the research being done into the Vatican’s so-called “secret archives,” the nuances of why something was or was not on the Index basically amounted to the opinion of one reviewer, unless it was appealed. For example, the initial reviewer who read _Uncle Tom’s Cabin_ was inclined to ban it for inciting revolutionary ideas, but it was appealed, and the second review gave it an all-clear.
I can see several reasons why _Les Miserables_ *might* have been on the Index, but I always caution that we’re dealing with a period of what Dietrich von Hildebrand called “ossification” in the Church, and some of Teresa of Avila’s works were lost to history while being reviewed by the Inquisition.
Also, many works were taken *off* the Index (i.e., St. Faustina’s Diary, with the usual explanation being that the first edition the Vatican got was poorly translated), and apparently Les Miserables was removed in 1959, 7 years before the Index was abolished.
Good answer. I have seen the movie, and I agree with the comments that the movie has themes of hope and redemption running throughout it. I found myself thinking back to how all the pain was caused by people’s actions: if Valjean’s sister’s husband had provided for his family like he should have, Valjean wouldn’t have stolen bread in the first place. If there had been more social support for the sister and her child, he wouldn’t have been as tempted to steal. If Fantine’s husband hadn’t abandoned her, she wouldn’t have had to leave Cosette to work out of town. That was my takeaway, and I was glad to be able to think that through because I saw the movie.
I’ve read Les Miserables twice and it is one of the most spiritual books I’ve ever read. The reason it was condemned before was probably because of how truthful it is. Anyways, I highly reccomend it.
I’d be careful with looking at it like that. We don’t want to promote the idea that the Church is in the business of suppressing the truth! The Church IS the truth!
Oh you are right, sorry, I was picturing the book in more of the category of the government banned books who were only banned because they were a little ahead of their time.
When I said truthful, also, I meant that some situations and characters were quite extreme (so I can see why some people would not like it) but the truth of the actual message of the story I think most people would admire – and I am not sure why the church banned it.
Mary. You are so wise! I love your blog and again am so glad I found it.
Ok Les mis is one of the best movies ive ever seen and it has catholic influences in it. How could it possibly be banned?
Fr Robert Barron does great film commentaries – here’s the one for Les Mis: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8APhduR3G1s